Archive for May, 2005

Fw: Fw: Fw: — An Analysis

Today I was sent the following from a close friend of mine:

Subject: Navy Seals

>
>
Two things Navy SEALS are always taught:

1. Keep your priorities in order
2. Know when to act without hesitation

A college professor, an avowed atheist and active in the ACLU, was teaching his class.
He shocked several of his students when he flatly stated that for once and for all he was going to prove there was no God. Addressing the ceiling he shouted: “GOD, if you are real, then I want you to knock me off this platform. I’ll give you exactly 15 minutes!!!!!”

The lecture room fell silent. You could hear a pin drop. Ten minutes went by.

“I’m waiting God, if you’re real, knock me off this platform!!!!”

Again after 5 minutes, the professor taunted God saying, “Here I am,God!!! I’m still waiting!!!”

His count down got down to the last couple of minutes when a Navy SEAL, just released from the Navy after serving in Afganistan and Iraq and newlyregistered in the class, walked up to the Professor.

The SEAL hit him full force in the face, and sent the Professor tumbling from his lofty platform.

>The Professor was out cold!! The students were stunned and shocked.
>
>
They began to babble in confusion. The SEAL nonchalantly took his seat in the front row and sat silent. The class looked at him and fell
silent…waiting.

Eventually, the professor came to and was noticeably shaken. He looked at the SEAL in the front row When the professor regained his senses and could speak he asked: “What the hell is the matter with you? Why did you do that!?”

“God was really busy protecting America’s soldiers, who are protecting your right to say stupid shit and act like an asshole!!!

So he sent me!!”

Upon reading the above I wondered what the underlying meaning of this parable is; granted, just asking that question casts me as the villain of the story. Anyway I came up with three main points:

  1. Intellectuals are arrogant, indecisive and ineffectual. Note that the professor is cast as an arrogant buffoon and students are ineffectual and helpless, whilst the Navy SEAL is cast as strong, powerful and decisive.
  2. Alternate belief systems are not to be trusted as they do not respect yours. Note the fact that the professor is described as being an Atheist and the crux of the tale focuses on his openly mocking God.
  3. Physical demonstrations of strength and violence are the preferred medium to convey one’s message. Rather than engaging in a debate with his teacher, the student decides the best course of action is an act of violence.

This story is certainly in vogue at the moment given the liberal bashing climate and the fervent nationalism that currently grips the nation but before stones are cast at me lets play with the story a little bit. What if the professor was cast as something other than atheist ACLU supporter? For example, “A college professor, an avowed Jew and active in the Anti-Defamation League, was teaching his class.” Does it change the tone of the story? Alter its message? Yes but only by casting it in a less acceptable light. Why should it be less reprehensible to rely on the tired stereotype of the nebbish, arrogant intellectual?

One of the marks of a militarized society is the passing along of messages such as the above, they are used to curb thought and reaffirm the belief that might equals right and that those different from you are a threat. Throughout history there are many examples of increasing militarization and anti-intellectualism going hand in hand, recent history points to the activities that took place in the middle of the last century all over the world, from Japan, Germany, to the Soviet Union. The United States has been no exception to the trend, having many moments in its history that was marked by hysterical jingoism and xenophobia, not to mention holding an extreme dislike of any and all intellectual pursuits.

As for the friend that passed this along, I am disappointed that you would find humor or wisdom in the story as well as feel that others should partake in its unabashed aggression and hate.

Fable, Buried Under Games

FableSo as if I did not have enough half-finished, sort of started games on my plate–KoTOR II, Paper Mario: TTYD, FF I and II, Golden Sun, Metroid Prime, and Halo 2– I picked up Fable this weekend. My mother-in-law had a stack of coupons for EB Games for $5 off any used game $24.99 or higher and just my luck their copy of Fable was $24.99. While I was there I also picked up an Edge card for another $5 which gets me 10% off all used game purchases so it looks like I’ll add to my unfinished stack in a big way–Jade Empire, Tales of Symphonia, Star Wars: Republic Commando, Minish Cap, and Metroid Prime 2.

Anyway, I am about 45 minutes into Fable working through the apprenticeship having finished sword fighting and archery, while still trying to be the fastest runner at the guild. My initial impressions of the game are positive with the graphics taking on a warm ethereal glow that seems to bathe everything adding to a soft dreamlike state. The character models are high;y expressive and the voice acting is solid though sometimes I feel like I am at a renaissance fair with the oddly affected British accents. So far the only serious complaint that I have is the absence of a button to re-center the camera can be a tad irksome particularly when performing tasks such as running and fighting which really require the camera to stay over the shoulder of the character.

The real question is, “Am I having fun?” Well, 45 minutes is not a whole lot of time to make that determination but so I am. One thing that my wife commented on while watching me play is that whenever there is a moral choice in games, like KoTOR, a unfailingly and instinctively take the good path and she is right on target since in both KoTORs I played by managing my light-side points striving to make my character portrait look like some sort of saint beatified on Dantooine. In Fable, the moral dilemmas so far have been minor, one child taunted me to smash the crates I was charged with watching and I could have been complicit in a married man’s side-dalliances. I each case I unthinkingly chose the route of a squeaky-clean-Beaver-Cleaver-goody-two-shoes, which is interesting because games like these, ones that present moral choices and consequences, are often intended for emergent game play behavior and to allow players to try out actions different than what they take in the real world.

So what does my style of game play mean? Am I not good enough in meat space that I need to work on it during game play or am I, as my wife puts it, an insufferable dogoodnik that I cannot fathom playing another way. Well, maybe. The thing of it is that I feel more comfortable making “good” choices when I can but if I am presented only choices of varying degrees of depravity than I am more likely to choose the worst of the lot. Take Grand Theft Auto as an example, I am utterly disinterested in advancing the plot what-so-ever preferring to spend an hour or more causing destruction and panic by running over pedestrians and perching up on a rooftop firing indiscriminately on the populace. If anything this shows that if presented with a choice I’ll tend towards “good” decisions but I am a personality that pursues decision paths to their extremes.

Oddly, the game play style does not neatly equate to my positions in the real world where I am more centrist in my positions preferring to find a balance of hue, tone, and color rather than being saturated by a single one. So does these mean that my game play reveals a deep seated need for clarification and simplification of my place in the world? That is certainly something to think about.

Upgrades Are Done

Took a little over six hours to get everything done but all is well with the Penguin Liberation Front. ;-)

The Future of Linux on Laptops

It’s great that HP is taking the step to offer alternatives to Windows on its laptop, I personally would love to be able to buy an OS-free laptop, but why limit this to just Europe, Africa, and the Middle East? Does HP have some sort of agreement with MS whereby all desktop and laptop products must be pre-loaded with some form of Windows and offering lines without would break said agreement? Yeah, I know the answer to that one. Anyway it is a great read and leaves me with a tinge of hope, however small. Read the article over at CoolTechZone.

Xbox 360: Games You Won’t See

Xbox 360

via The Joy of Tech

Nokia 770

Nokia 770

This has me wondering about the apparent resurgence of Internet-Appliances. The Nokia 770 is coming fast on the heels of the Pepper Pad, an expensive solution, and is leaving me wondering if the 3COM Audrey was just ahead of its time by six or so years. Anyway, Engadet has a quick blurb about the new Nokia 770 as featured on MobileBurn. The unit features what appears to be a very bright screen running at 800×480, Linux as its OS, and Gnome as its UI. The biggest drawback to the 770 is the installed memory, 128MB RAM, 64MB for user, and a 64MB RS-MMC so it really is not meant to be used as a storage device. Price point will be around $350 so it might be tough to justify the unit when a full fledged laptop can be had for another $300, though if later versions come out as a cellphone capable device and carriers pick them up I will certainly be more than interested.





Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 United States