<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ummmm&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://elwoodicious.com/2007/06/28/ummmm/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://elwoodicious.com/2007/06/28/ummmm/</link>
	<description>Those who can make you believe absurdities can make you commit atrocities. —Voltaire</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 09:11:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: james</title>
		<link>http://elwoodicious.com/2007/06/28/ummmm/#comment-1756</link>
		<dc:creator>james</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jun 2007 13:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elwoodicious.com/2007/06/28/ummmm/#comment-1756</guid>
		<description>Yeah, immutable storage is one of my main concerns and the solution seems to be replicating to at least one data node that resides in a standard configuration but beyond that there are some nagging doubts that plague the concept.  

The biggest is security, since most most clusters are built behind a firewall and reside on a privet network are4 a little easier to secure but EC2 doesn't &lt;a href="http://developer.amazonwebservices.com/connect/thread.jspa;jsessionid=D179636F07A22B56E32BAFF5E7E43484?messageID=44478&#44478" rel="nofollow"&gt;support private subnets&lt;/a&gt; (at the moment) and setting up a VPN will kill performance. What to do? 

The other concern is the cost.  While it's pretty cheap to deploy a server or two launching a load balancer, cluster manager, two data nodes, and a SQL server could get a little pricey.  

Thanks for the tip, though, I will definitely check out TheGridLayer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, immutable storage is one of my main concerns and the solution seems to be replicating to at least one data node that resides in a standard configuration but beyond that there are some nagging doubts that plague the concept.  </p>
<p>The biggest is security, since most most clusters are built behind a firewall and reside on a privet network are4 a little easier to secure but EC2 doesn&#8217;t <a href="http://developer.amazonwebservices.com/connect/thread.jspa;jsessionid=D179636F07A22B56E32BAFF5E7E43484?messageID=44478&#44478" rel="nofollow">support private subnets</a> (at the moment) and setting up a VPN will kill performance. What to do? </p>
<p>The other concern is the cost.  While it&#8217;s pretty cheap to deploy a server or two launching a load balancer, cluster manager, two data nodes, and a SQL server could get a little pricey.  </p>
<p>Thanks for the tip, though, I will definitely check out TheGridLayer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bert Armijo</title>
		<link>http://elwoodicious.com/2007/06/28/ummmm/#comment-1755</link>
		<dc:creator>Bert Armijo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Jun 2007 23:31:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://elwoodicious.com/2007/06/28/ummmm/#comment-1755</guid>
		<description>You're going to have a tough time with MySQL on EC2 due to the lack of permanent disk storage. Mark Atwood got a great deal of attention just for getting it to read from S3.

If you're not complete set on EC2 try TheGridlayer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re going to have a tough time with MySQL on EC2 due to the lack of permanent disk storage. Mark Atwood got a great deal of attention just for getting it to read from S3.</p>
<p>If you&#8217;re not complete set on EC2 try TheGridlayer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
