Posts Tagged ‘Technology’

I Love Kutiman

Wednesday, March 11th, 2009

I often get excited about new things everyday exclaiming their life changing properties but Kutiman is something different. DJ Shadow’s album Entroducing… shattered all my ill-conceived notions of art and music and clear my mind for the notion of cutting and pasting sound collages, Kutiman takes that to the next logical step by mining YouTube videos for melodies and rhythms and then stitching them together to form hilarious Funk breakdowns, grinding Drum and Bass anthems, or haunting ballads.

My favorite track (video?) by far is I’m New as the vocalists are sublime…

Someday is a close second as Sarah Amstutz has a wonderful voice.

Important Inventions In My Life

Friday, December 8th, 2006

Tyler wrote up the top eight inventions in his life and it got me thinking–beyond the implications of muppets and porn being on the same list–about the top inventions in my life. Likely this list will radically change in the coming weeks but for now here it stands:

  1. Books
  2. Internet
  3. MP3
  4. Linux
  5. Wok
  6. Razors
  7. Sunglasses
  8. Coffee

Those eight items are me in in a nutshell.

Putting the “Ultra” back in ultrasound

Friday, July 14th, 2006

Gabriella Anne

The top picture is GE’s new Virtual 4D Scan technology, which this picture does little justice. It is simply amazing to see our baby as if she was in our arms. The bottom picture is a traditional ultrasound they provided for contrast; makes her look like a Gloworm but I love her all the same.

0.333 as a Sitegraph

Wednesday, June 7th, 2006

Never one to miss out on trends on the Internet I bring you 0.333 as a Sitegraph.

0.333 as a Sitegraph

The best part is watching it bloom like a flower as it is being generated.  Thanks to Aharef for supplying and hosting the applet that makes it all possible.

What I do with my time is political.

Wednesday, May 31st, 2006

The DVD War Against Consumers is why I am putting down the remote and picking up books more often.

Control is something that I continually whine about here: I want more of it and I think that all users are entitled to it. The trouble with the direction that IP law has been taking is that its aim is to strip users of that control. Whatever the media you might consume and the devices that you consume them on is increasingly being dictated by “rights holders” and in the coming years it is very likely that the TV or PC you purchase will be the sole domain of those very same “rights holders” and you the consumer will have little say over how those devices can cannot be used. Want to watch a home movie on your Blu-Ray player? Maybe, maybe not. Can you prove that content is yours? Want to do it on your Vista 2.0 PC? Same question. Want to change your TV or monitor? Better make sure that it is playback compliant with all the other devices in the chain.

My growing awareness with these issues is one of the reasons I moved over to Linux, not because I want the ability to modify the OS but because I want the ability to should the need arise. The trouble with that, however, is my decision will likely marginalize me from mainstream content. It is dissident behavior and if I am unwilling to play by Hollywood or Remond’s rules than I will invariably be locked out from their products so the choices that I make, with regards to entertainment and productivity, becoming increasingly political in nature. Do I support the current system? Do I lend credence to a system that waters down the concept and practice of Fair Use by purchasing products and content that diminish utility?

My thinking over the past couple of years is focused on shoring up and protecting the concept of Fair Use by careful consideration of what products I purchase as well as who I vote for–there are two fronts to this struggle. I purchase products and make use of services that do not treat me as a criminal, a fool, or worse, both. The result is that I find myself withdrawing from popular culture and mainstream society at an increasing rate which in turn likely marginalizes me further as I have less ground on which to relate the necessity for people to consider and protect their rights as a consumer.

So before my pessimism increases beyond my ability to communicate here’s a thought: rather than give your money to Sony, Microsoft, Toshiba, or Intel for one of their fabulous “content protection” devices and before you plunk down money on DRM encrusted content of your favorite movie, TV show, or album why not donate the money to RIF or your local library. At least with books, for the moment, you can read them when you want, take them where you wish, and even share them with friends and family.

Why PR ruins the news…

Tuesday, May 23rd, 2006

Sure the byline reads, Michael V. Copeland, Business 2.0 Magazine senior writer, but the article On the Launchpad: Unlocking the iPod is written like a self-congratulatory shill piece typically pumped out by over paid PR firms that Astroturf the news outlets. Minor massaging it is no different than this piece found over at MacNN. Hell, just Google for it and you’ll see close variations on a theme. From business to politics to health-care to world events this type of mouthpiece writing is prevalent and it does a disservice to the consumer of the news. Then again, if you follow the money, who is the real customer?

Not you and not me. The real customers are the ones paying for the placement of these pieces and they are paying for readership. It is the same model as broadcast television where the viewing public is the product and the customer is the advertisers, same model as Google AdWords. So what bothers me about this more than advertising? PR is insidious in that it clothes itself the trappings of authority and responsibility alluding to the notion of substance. Advertising is much more easily spotted in that it does not often pretend that it is any more than what it is, though there are exceptions it is less disturbing and damaging than PR which inserts itself in and amongst items that might actually be news.

PR pieces are laudatory and do not ask the obvious and sometimes difficult to answer questions. In the case of Navio that would be, “How is this different than every other closed source solution that has preceded it?”, “So, tell me, I’m going have to buy yet another device for playback of music and movies?”, “Great, another phone-home solution that will also act as a layer between me and my hardware and likely cause nothing but headaches when I want to burn a CD of photos from my kids first birthday. Why?”  I suppose that I ask too much from the Fourth Estate.
To Navio, the PR machine, and all the news outlets that run this crap without asking the tough as well as easy questions, I say screw you.